Logic is necessarily triadic. That of triadic philosophy understands logic to be what tends toward goodness and to require consideration of any reality under the gaze of ethics and aesthetics. This is an original concept. It sees both triadic and logic as ontological terms.
Henceforth when I refer to something as triadic I mean that it involves a post-binary approach. I mean that ethics and aesthetics in that order are the second and third elements on a process of thinking that proceeds from the root of thought which is Reality which is also understood to be signs which are part of universal consciousness.
Peirce did not claim any of this and I doubt there are many existing philosophers who would accept it. But this forum exists mainly because here is no acceptable means at present of building on Peirce's thought to bring him to a fully developed stature as America's and perhaps the globe's successor to Aristotle.
It is also the best way I know to record the evolution of Triadic Philosophy as a living reality.
Henceforth when I refer to something as triadic I mean that it involves a post-binary approach. I mean that ethics and aesthetics in that order are the second and third elements on a process of thinking that proceeds from the root of thought which is Reality which is also understood to be signs which are part of universal consciousness.
Peirce did not claim any of this and I doubt there are many existing philosophers who would accept it. But this forum exists mainly because here is no acceptable means at present of building on Peirce's thought to bring him to a fully developed stature as America's and perhaps the globe's successor to Aristotle.
It is also the best way I know to record the evolution of Triadic Philosophy as a living reality.